In a world of misinformation, Fitness Pudding is here to separate fact from fallacy, and science from fiction.
Babies suck.
Let me explain. Infants have a natural reflex for what is called nonnutritive sucking (NNS), such as sucking on their thumb or a pacifier. They do not get any nutrition from this sucking, as they would with breastfeeding, thus “nonnutritive.”
We also see occasional nonnutritive sucking from my favorite sports teams. But, I digress.
Due to the rise in the number of obese children, and that breastfeeding can be associated with a reduced risk of pediatric overweight, researchers recently had a hypothesis that, “infants with their innate desire for gratification through [nonnutritive sucking] may overfeed if the bottle or breast is constantly being offered instead of a pacifier to satisfy this need.”1
In other words, since babies like sucking, if parents are constantly feeding them (especially with formula versus breast milk), the babies will keep sucking, increasing their risk of overfeeding and being overweight.
With this in mind, almost 400 infants 9 to 15 months old (95% African American, only 5% college-educated) were separated into two groups, based on whether or not the pacifier was used consistently for ≥ 9 months.
They then looked at the percentages of children classified as overweight or obese in each group. As you see here, there was an increased prevalence of overweight and obesity in infants who’s parents did not use a pacifier consistently than those who parents did use the pacifier consistently.
Pacifier User |
Pacifier Non-User |
|
Overweight |
11% |
21% |
Obese |
11% |
16% |
Okay, so why would this be?
Based on their results, the majority of mothers (70%) stated that pacifier use was used to minimize frequent feedings, which was even more important in the formula fed babies - since there are increased odds of being overweight in children who are formula fed instead of breast fed.
Another recent study just found that the opposite results. 250 infants were followed from 10-14 days postpartum for 2 years. In this case, mothers were largely white, non-Hispanic, married, and college educated.
As shown in this figure, those who used a pacifier 4 months or later had a higher percentage of infants classified as "overweight" at 1 year and 2 years.
Most likely, both.
The two samples were quite different, including their ethnicity, education level, socieoeconomic status, and use of formula vs. breastfeeding. Also, the researchers in the first study did not examine differences by timing of pacifier use (earlier vs. later infancy), as in the second study.
Thus, the authors conclude, "These conflicting results suggest that relationships between pacifiers and weight may differ depending on timing of use, highlighting the need for additional longitudinal studies."2
So, this one is clarify.
So, it appears that pacifier use could be helpful in some infants, but not others. We do not know why, but it appears to be related to whether or not the pacifier use allows the parent to breastfeed the proper amount and timing for the health of the baby.
For more information on how much you should feed your child to keep them healthy, please see your Pediatrician.
---
Dr. Faries has a Ph.D. in Behavioral Medicine and a Master of Science in Exercise Physiology, balanced with experience across the fitness industry, medicine, public health, research and extension.
His research explores why and how people initiate and maintain healthy behaviors, with focus on self-regulation success and failure. In other words, he seeks to better understand the common struggle with adopting healthy lifestyles, clarifying the reasons why we don’t “just do it.” Dr. Faries also holds unique expertise in medication adherence, when lifestyle is the medicine.
Dr. Faries also trains the next generation of ‘myth busters’ through medical and public health education, including his popular course, MythBusters: Health Edition.
Dr. Faries has served on the Board of Directors of the American College of Lifestyle Medicine, is founder of Lone Star Lifestyle Medicine for Texas, and is founder of FitnessPudding.com – a non-profit site dedicated to debunking common health and fitness myths.