In a world of misinformation, Fitness Pudding is here to separate fact from fallacy, and science from fiction.
We know that physical activity is a key component to successful weight loss and maintenance, especially when paired with healthy food (energy) intake.
However, some research suggests that differences in weight loss might be explained (at least partially) by an increase in energy intake to compensate for the energy expenditure of physical activity.2
To see if this is true or not, recent interest has focused on the effect of a short-term bout of exercise on hunger and energy intake. In other words, if you were to exercise in the morning, would you be hungrier and eat more at lunch – compared to if you did not exercise?
Despite what many might believe, there is little to no current evidence that short-term (acute) exercise increases hunger or energy intake in normal weight, overweight or obese adults.1,4,6,7 In actuality, short-term exercise might actually have a satiating (hunger reducing) effect in the short-term.3,7
Perhaps exercise intensity could be the culprit? A recent study with 12 overweight/obese volunteers put this question to the test.5 Participants exercised across three different conditions that expended the same amount of energy (250 Calories), plus a control condition:
1. Short duration high-intensity intermittent cycling
2. Long duration high-intensity intermittent cycling
3. Moderate intensity continuous cycling
4. No exercise control (just sat there)
Participants completed each of the 4 conditions 1-hour after breakfast, and everything from appetite to hormones were measured for 3 hours after the exercise bout.
Their findings support that exercise, even at varying intensities, did not increase appetite. Also, those in the exercise conditions did not eat more food or more unhealthfully during their lunch meal following their post-breakfast exercise session.
The authors conclude, "Our findings suggest that, in overweight/obese individuals, isocaloric bouts [same amount of Calories expended] of moderate- or high-intensity exercise lead to a similar appetite response. This strengthens previous findings in normal-weight individuals that acute exercise, even at high intensity, does not induce any known physiological adaptation that would lead to increased [energy intake]."
Interestingly, this study provides evidence that just sitting there, such as at work, might actually increase appetite! While the exercise conditions reduced hunger during and after exercise, the control condition, where participants just sitting there 1-hour after breakfast, had an increase in hunger.
So, exercising enough to expend 250 Calories, which is quite normal and doable for most people, does not appear to be enough to increase one's appetite. For perspective, it would take a 150 lbs person going on a brisk walk (2.5 mph) about 75 minutes to expend 250 Calories, and a 200 lbs person about 55 minutes.
But, what about 600 Calories? Maybe, if we expended nearly 3 times the amount of energy, we would eat more?
Well, researchers found that 60-minutes of exercise expending about 600 Calories did not increase appetite or food consumption – rather was able to reduce appetite and the amount of food eaten at a lunch in obese, adult men.8 They ate breakfast at 8:50 am, exercised (or sat quietly) at 10:00 am for 1-hour, and then ate lunch at 12:00 pm.
During lunch, the exercise condition ate an average of 614 Calories, compared to 944 Calories when they just sat quietly during that hour – a difference of 330 Calories.
The current research supports that short bouts of exercise do NOT increase our appetite, rather it might actually help reduce it in the short-term. Exercising before lunch for 60 minutes, compared to sitting for 60 minutes, was shown to reduce how much food was eaten at lunch by an average of 330 Calories.
Thus, physical activity might be an advocate for energy intake control, rather than an adversary. Sitting might be our more potent adversary.
More research is needed to determine long-term effects of exercise on metabolism, hunger- and energy-related hormones, and subsequent weight control. Stay tuned.
One final, important note regarding food choice that I think is very relevant here. The amount of Calories we eat (quantity), is highly impacted by the 'quality' of food we choose.
Even if exercise did make you hungry, consider the following two meal choices:
We know the nutritional differences, but what about Calories?
That is a difference of over 1,000 Calories, simply by focusing on the 'quality' of the food choices. So, you could eat either of these meals for your lunch following a morning workout.
Which would you choose?
---
Dr. Faries has a Ph.D. in Behavioral Medicine and a Master of Science in Exercise Physiology, balanced with experience across the fitness industry, medicine, public health, research and extension.
His research explores why and how people initiate and maintain healthy behaviors, with focus on self-regulation success and failure. In other words, he seeks to better understand the common struggle with adopting healthy lifestyles, clarifying the reasons why we don’t “just do it.” Dr. Faries also holds unique expertise in medication adherence, when lifestyle is the medicine.
Dr. Faries also trains the next generation of ‘myth busters’ through medical and public health education, including his popular course, MythBusters: Health Edition.
Dr. Faries has served on the Board of Directors of the American College of Lifestyle Medicine, is founder of Lone Star Lifestyle Medicine for Texas, and is founder of FitnessPudding.com – a non-profit site dedicated to debunking common health and fitness myths.